Hace rato que no se celebra el 12 de octubre. Hace 13 años, con el gusto que predomina por los números redondos hubo más ruido. Pero ahora, salvo algún acto escolar, el Día de la Raza, de la Hispanidad, de Colón o de las Américas, como les guste llamarlo, es apenas un feriado más (desplazable, encima, en nuestro caso lo que lo hace más intrascendente).
No soy para nada defensor de aquello que los delirantes de los años veinte buscaban pintar como la Raza, ni siquiera me gusta eso de argentinidad. Y valga la observación que cuando Noel, Guido, y sobre todo Ricardo Rojas pujaban por "inventar" la nacionalidad justamente los argentinos éstábamos conformandonos como éste amasijo de nacionalidades, de etnias y de culturas que en realidad somos.
Lo que hace falta es poner en magnitud el significado de aquella proeza, encarada principalmente por España, que con unos cuantos expedicionarios, mal equipados, sin monta y peor advertidos en términos geográficos, vencieron la adversidad y establecieron su dominio, su ley y su cultura sobre la inmensidad de América.
En estos rincones perdidos del mundo llegaron y se establecieron por 1516. Si consideramos que la independencia ocurrió en 1816, tenemos trescientos años contra ciento ochenta y nueve de vida independiente. Y si -como yo creo- consideramos a la Argentina como tal recién desde la sanción de la constitución, son trescientos años contra apenas 152 de vida nacional. A pesar de que la inmigración nos forjó tal cual somos, mantenemos en esencia aquel origen. Somos algo así como españoles genéticamente modificados. Y deberíamos estar orgullosos de serlo, a la vez que deberíamos estar orgullosos -como es mi caso- de nuestra herencia italiana. O turca, o judía, o serbia, o la que sea. Porque eso somos.
Pero sin embargo, en un país que prefiere imaginar que es lo que no es, y pensar en un mundo que no existe, olvidamos cómo nos hicimos, y preferimos la utopía regresiva. (Link vía Víctor)
argenblogs
12 de octubre de 2005
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios(
Atom)
4 comentarios:
Bravo, Rubén. Me siento identificadísimo con el texto.
Un abrazo
cWeighing the Columbus Cargo
by Edward Hudgins
From the Washington Times
October 10, 2005
http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php ?StoryID=20051009-101034-4633r
Many critics argue Christopher Columbus gave us a devil's bargain. In October 1492 that Italian explorer, working for Spain, opened America to his fellow Europeans. The result: We got a prosperous New World by impoverishing, enslaving and murdering the natives who were already here.
But this fails to distinguish between two types of exploitation, one over other humans and the other over nature. The former should be expunged from our moral codes and civilized society, the latter is the essence of morality and civilization.
Human exploitation was suffered especially by the tens of millions of inhabitants of the pre-Columbian lands from Mexico through South America. Cortes the Conquistador, for example, defeated the Aztec rulers of Mexico. Many of the tribes that were subject to the Aztecs sided with Cortes; they hated the Aztecs for, among other things, their practice of cutting the living hearts out of members of tribes they subjugated, as sacrifices to their gods. Cortes imposed his rule on the Aztecs and their subjects alike, replacing one tyranny with another. The natives were treated harshly and many forced to work as de facto or actual slaves for their new masters.
On the other hand, many settlers, especially in North America which had far fewer natives, took a different path. They came to the New World to build their own lives. They did not prosper by conquering other men but, rather, by conquering nature.
They had to clear the land, plant and sow crops. They had to practice the trades of carpenters, masons, loggers, miners, blacksmiths and tailors to build their towns and to create the necessities for life and prosperity. In the centuries that followed, their descendants -- including Americans today -- built the richest, most prosperous country on Earth.
Today it is chic among back-to-nature types to idealize the pre-Columbian natives and question whether what we have today constitutes real progress. This silliness was given philosophical credence by the 18th-century thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau's notion of the "noble savage." No doubt many individual natives were as noble as one could be in savage circumstances, but America before Columbus was no Eden.
Let's put aside the wars between tribes, the outright brutality and the like, and just look at the daily lives of the Indians before Columbus. Life was lived simply, in primitive cycles. Natives inhabited crude hovels and hunted or used subsistence farming to sustain themselves. Yes, they could enjoy family and friends, tell tales of bringing down buffalo, and imagine that the stars in the sky painted pictures of giant bears and other creatures. The ancestors of Europeans did the same.
But true human life, either for an individual or society, is not an endless, stagnant cycle. Rather, it is a growth in knowledge, in power over the environment, and in individual liberty.
Perhaps many pre-Columbian natives were content with their lot in a simple, animal-like existence. But what of young Indian children who wondered why family members sickened and died and if there were ways unknown to the shamans to relieve their pain or cure them; if there were ways to build shelters that would resist bitter winters, stifling summers and the storms that raged in both seasons; whether there were ways to guarantee food would always be abundant and starvation no longer a drought away; why plants grow and what those lights in the sky really were; and whether they could ever actually fly like birds and observe mountains from the height of eagles? Where were the opportunities for these natives?
Three ideas from Enlightenment Europe provided keys to true human life. First was the idea we as individuals have a right to our own dreams and desires, that we are not simply tied to a tribe or the wishes of others, that civilization means individuals are free to live their own lives, as long as they acknowledge the similar freedom of others.
Second was the understanding that through the rational exercise of our minds we can truly discover the nature of the world around us, replacing myths -- no matter how beautiful or poetic -- with real knowledge.
And third was the appreciation such knowledge allows us to bend nature to our wills. Through our thoughts and actions, we gain the pride of achieving the best within us.
The clash between the cultures of pre-Columbian natives and European immigrants certainly produced injustices for natives. But it would have been unjust for those natives to expect the immigrants to hold themselves to the level of primitive cultures and beliefs. The true long-term tragedy is that so many descendants of the pre-Columbian peoples in North America ended up on reservations rather than integrated into a society that offers opportunities for each individual to excel.
Columbus opened a whole new land for those who would tame nature and build a new, free and prosperous nation. We should celebrate the opportunity for America that he gave us -- not apologize for it.
A ponerse el taparrabos y a tomar sol muchachos...que si nos agarra la revolucion Bolivariana disfrazados de europeos, nos capan.
Acá en el sur de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, donde todavía se recuerda con horror a los malones, que vengan a elogiar al indio.
Porqué no se van a indigenizarse al carajo?
Ah, perdon, no son más indios, ahora son "Pueblos Originarios".
Tommy (desde el exilio patagónico)
Publicar un comentario en la entrada