31 de agosto de 2011

Cue ball

The warning signs of defending the status quo

When confronted with a new idea, do you:

  • Consider the cost of switching before you consider the benefits?
  • Highlight the pain to a few instead of the benefits for the many?
  • Exaggerate how good things are now in order to reduce your fear of change?
  • Undercut the credibility, authority or experience of people behind the change?
  • Grab onto the rare thing that could go wrong instead of amplifying the likely thing that will go right?
  • Focus on short-term costs instead of long-term benefits, because the short-term is more vivid for you?
  • Fight to retain benefits and status earned only through tenure and longevity?
  • Embrace an instinct to accept consistent ongoing costs instead of swallowing a one-time expense?
  • Slow implementation and decision making down instead of speeding it up?
  • Embrace sunk costs?
  • Imagine that your competition is going to be as afraid of change as you are? Even the competition that hasn't entered the market yet and has nothing to lose...
  • Emphasize emergency preparation at the expense of a chronic and degenerative condition?
  • Compare the best of what you have now with the possible worst of what a change might bring?

Calling it out when you see it might give your team the strength to make a leap.


Post original Seth Godin

Tiene que ver con decisiones empresariales, pero se adapta perfectamente a explicar el triunfo de CFK

1 comentario:

Mike dijo...

Highlight the pain to a few instead of the benefits for the many?

No es esto lo que hacemos nosotros todos los días desde nuestra humilda trinchera ? Combatir la dictadura de las mayorías que buscan el "greater good" a costa del sacrificio de los menos, quienes pagamos la fiesta ? Eso es "mantener el statu quo" ?

(btw, es statu, no status, que es una gran banda de rock and roll)

Godin en general es interesante pero aquí mictura a gran distancia del recipiente.