Richard Goldstone, el juez sudafricano que preparó el informe oficial de la ONU sobre el conflicto en Gaza de 2008/09, acaba de publicar una columna en el Washington Post en la que "reconsidera" algunas de las afirmaciones y conclusiones de su trabajo, y admite haber pecado de idealismo (por así decirlo) en ciertas partes.
(...)
Some have suggested that it was absurd to expect Hamas, an organization that has a policy to destroy the state of Israel, to investigate what we said were serious war crimes. It was my hope, even if unrealistic, that Hamas would do so, especially if Israel conducted its own investigations. At minimum I hoped that in the face of a clear finding that its members were committing serious war crimes, Hamas would curtail its attacks. Sadly, that has not been the case. Hundreds more rockets and mortar rounds have been directed at civilian targets in southern Israel. That comparatively few Israelis have been killed by the unlawful rocket and mortar attacks from Gaza in no way minimizes the criminality. The U.N. Human Rights Council should condemn these heinous acts in the strongest terms.
In the end, asking Hamas to investigate may have been a mistaken enterprise. So, too, the Human Rights Council should condemn the inexcusable and cold-blooded recent slaughter of a young Israeli couple and three of their small children in their beds.
(...)
2 comentarios:
Lastima , o no,depende ,que Carlos se borro de este blog,seria interesante leer que tiene que decir ahora
Este era un caso raro. De todas formas, no se olvide que estos chicos hacen todo por idealismo. Mirad como exculpan los hijos de los espías judeomericanos a sus papis:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=42151
Aprended de ellos, cándidos como palomas, astutos como serpientes.
Publicar un comentario